LexisNexis ® Legal & Professional today announced the release of the Lex Machina® 2026 Employment Litigation Report, which provides a highly detailed analysis of trends in federal employment lawsuits ...
On March 4, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that employers cannot contractually shrink ...
After an hour of oral arguments today in Green v. Brennan, one thing seemed fairly clear: despite the very able efforts of Washington attorney Catherine Carroll, who was appointed to defend the lower ...
A Riverside workplace discrimination attorney guides you through every step of your dispute. They’ll help you document ...
In Bostock v. Clayton County, the Supreme Court ruled that anti-LGBTQ discrimination violates the federal law against discrimination in the workplace. The Bostock case consisted of three cases that ...
In a decision[1] issued June 5, 2025, the United States Supreme Court unanimously found that the burden of proof on a plaintiff asserting an employment discrimination claim is the same, regardless of ...
The plaintiff, a clinical pharmacist, alleged race-based discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. The plaintiff claimed that his employer ...
The case came about as one of the first cases adhering to the Supreme Court ruling that employees aren’t required to show sustainable damage such as pay cuts, demotions or terminations to pursue ...
City sought to keep lawsuit in federal court, but judge rules no longer any federal claims to decide NEWARK, NJ – A federal judge in New Jersey has ruled that a lawsuit filed by former City of Orange ...
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) will reportedly resume considering discrimination cases brought by transgender people after a months-long pause in which staffers were ordered ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results